Proof during the prejudicial inquiry of smugglingof narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs, or precursors under the legislation of Ukraine

The object of the study is social relations regarding prejudicial inquiry smuggling narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances, their analogs or precursors. It has been found that there are scholars who choose different definitions for interpreting nature proof, but unanimous about role this process in proving a person’s guilt and choosing an adequate punishment. authors use set scientific methods modern epistemology as well comparative, special legal, logical other methods. We propose to analyze all circumstances subject proof during analogs, In paper must identify general grounds be proved each crime specific important prove only case conclusion made importance proper procedural support criminal prosecution persons have committed under Article 305 Criminal Code Ukraine. Therefore, we include evidence inquiry.